The Grandstanding & The Clapback: RGIII, Angel Reese, and the Price of Performative Allyship

Alright y'all. Let's strap in. In 2025, everyone's got a platform, some more deservedly than others. Many people will jump onto hot topics to further their brand, but not everyone understands the assignment. When it comes to Black women athletes, it seems like some folks just can't resist inserting themselves into narratives that aren't theirs to control. Enter Robert Griffin III, stage left, with a recent masterclass in what happens when "support" veers into self-serving spectacle. This pattern, for many, is amplified by his widely perceived hatred for Black women and his publicly noted fetish for white women.

This isn't about old feuds or recycled beef, though for those paying attention, the pattern might feel distressingly familiar. Remember the infamous clash with Rob Parker? Or more recently, the heated exchange with Ryan Clark that openly questioned RGIII's understanding of Black women's experiences given his own relational choices? This isn't an isolated incident; this is about a specific moment, a series of tweets, and the glaring spotlight they shone on how power, perception, and allyship can get dangerously twisted.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The Setup: RGIII's "Concern" and the Convenient Timing (Tweet 1)

Picture this: RGIII drops a tweet, condemning the absolutely abhorrent racist attacks against Angel Reese, specifically, those dehumanizing depictions of her as a monkey. And let's be clear, his denouncement of anti-Black racism? Laudable. Necessary. The kind of thing we should see from prominent figures.

However, the narrative takes a sharp and predictable turn. He frames his previous silence as a protective measure, claiming Angel Reese reposted a video that allegedly led to threats against his wife and children. This attempt to rationalize his actions, particularly given his past comments and known preferences, only fuels the perception of his animosity towards Black women. And just when you thought it couldn't get more convoluted, he doubles down on his initial controversial take, asserting that Angel Reese "hates Caitlin Clark," claiming to have received "confirmation of this from people in Angel's inner circle".

Okay, let's break this down. On the one hand, RGIII is calling out racism – fantastic. On the other hand, he's spinning a tale about personal threats (conveniently linking them to Reese), and then, with zero verifiable evidence, he's back to diagnosing Angel Reese's emotions and motivations. This isn't just a controversial claim; it's a bold assertion of insider knowledge that immediately raised red flags. It's a move straight out of the grifter playbook: pivot from a clear positive (denouncing racism) to a dubious, inflammatory claim, all while centering his own experience.

I want to reiterate, saying the the photo was terrible and shooting down racism is great. Here's the kicker though. RGIII could have simply stopped there. A short, unambiguous post denouncing the racist attacks would have been powerful. But no, he chose a different path. He even chose to post a photo of the very dehumanizing depiction he claimed was "so bad," as if he needed to provide context for the racism he was supposedly condemning. The optics alone reek of a desperate need to control the narrative, to ensure his voice was central, even if it meant re-circulating the very imagery he decried.

The Clapback: Angel Reese's Mother Enters the Chat (Tweet 2)

You know what they say about those "inner circles," right? They're usually pretty tight. And Angel Reese's mother, @awebbreese, wasted precisely no time in shutting down RGIII's alleged "insider confirmation". Her response was swift, direct, and devastatingly simple: "🧢".

She didn't mince words. Angel's circle, she noted, is "small and tight-knit". And for RGIII, the message was crystal clear: "stay on that side" because "the doors are closed over here".

Let's be real for a second. This isn't just a disagreement; it's a public disavowal. Angel Reese's own mother is calling out RGIII for a perceived boundary violation, for speaking as if he has intimate knowledge of her daughter's thoughts when, according to the very family he's allegedly "protecting," he does not. It raises critical questions: Is RGIII genuinely trying to support, or is he subtly (or not-so-subtly) re-centering the narrative around himself, even in a moment when Angel Reese is facing racialized attacks? The evidence here suggests the latter, especially when viewed through the lens of his perceived contempt for Black women.

Angel Herself: "Nasty Work" for Clout (Tweet 3)

As if her mother's message wasn't clear enough, Angel Reese herself stepped into the fray with her own unfiltered thoughts:

"Lying on this app when everybody know the first and last name of everybody in my circle for clout is nastyyyy work."

Let that sink in. "Lying… for clout… is nastyyyy work". Angel Reese, the very subject of RGIII's "protection," sees his actions as opportunistic, as attention-seeking. This isn't about RGIII having a "different opinion." This is about a prominent man inserting himself into a younger Black woman's business, allegedly fabricating connections, and doing so in a way that feels exploitative rather than genuinely supportive. This incident only solidifies the public perception of his animosity, particularly when contrasted with his well-documented fetishization of white women. It reinforces a frustrating pattern where Black women, especially those in the public eye, are constantly spoken for or about rather than simply being listened to. Their agency is sidelined for someone else's narrative.

The Broader Lens: Obsession and Engagement Farming (Tweet 4)

And if you needed external validation for Angel's perspective, @theNFLchick (BMORE Reeta) summed it up perfectly:

"The obsession is very real, and he's using you for engagement farming. Nasty work."

This isn't just an isolated incident. It's a piece of a larger puzzle. RGIII's behavior fits within a growing trend of online performativity. It's about leveraging controversy, particularly one involving a high-profile Black woman and another superstar athlete, for visibility and platform growth. When your "allyship" looks suspiciously like a cynical play for clicks and attention, it stops being allyship and starts being exploitation.

The Verdict: Accountability is the Only Way Forward

What we've witnessed here isn't genuine solidarity; it's performative allyship at its most transparent. RGIII's public condemnation of racism, while necessary, is severely undermined by his simultaneous spreading of unverified, inflammatory claims about Angel Reese's motivations. He positioned himself as someone with insider access, an authoritative voice on Reese's emotions – a claim she and her mother firmly, and publicly, denied.

This whole exchange shines a bright light on the power dynamics in modern-day media narratives. When a prominent man inserts himself into a story involving a younger Black woman fabricating connections and speaking for her, it's not just a misstep. It's a fundamental disregard for her agency.

And what's RGIII's reaction to the predictable pushback? Now that he's made this post, and the backlash that seems almost custom-ordered is here, he's tweeting like crazy, playing the victim. The sudden deluge of self-pitying posts is less a genuine reflection and more a calculated defense, a desperate attempt to pivot from accountability to martyrdom.

When figures like Bernice King feel compelled to call you out, it's a profound indication you've veered catastrophically off course. But for someone seemingly so invested in maintaining a particular public image, such weighty criticism from an icon of social justice probably means very little.

The blame here isn't on those who "misinterpret" his words. It's squarely on RGIII for crafting a narrative that, despite its stated intentions, ultimately exploited Angel Reese's situation for his own perceived gain, while simultaneously muddying the waters around crucial conversations about race and gender in sports.

What's Your Take?

This is the kind of cultural autopsy we specialize in at the Black Culture Geekz Substack. We don't just state the facts; we explore the flawed logic behind the headlines.

Beyond the initial tweet, what does RGIII's reaction to the backlash—playing the victim and constant tweeting—reveal about his approach to public accountability?

How can we differentiate between genuine allyship and performative actions online?

Let us know your unfiltered thoughts in the comments. We read everything.

If you appreciate analysis that cuts through the noise and gets to the heart of the matter, subscribe to the Black Culture Geekz Substack. You'll get our weekly deep dives, exclusive show notes, and access to a community that loves to debate the culture on a higher level.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.